19, 572 71, 594 5, 963 97, 129 2, 545 20, 508 67, 854 3, 815 92, 177 2, 644 22, 648 68, 770 4, 437 95, 855 5, 893 22, 544 62, 370 3, 408 88, 322 6, 502
Copyright Law of the Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt States of America (Title 17, Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt States Code) (Bulletin 14). 1960 edition. 68 p. Paper. 25 cents. Orders for the above publication may be tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt and remittances tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt either to the Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D.C., or to the Register of Copyrights, Library of Congress, Washington 25, D.C. BIBLIOGRAPHY O N Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt RIGHTS ("Droits Vo~sins"): Protection o f performers, produccrr of tttttttttttttttttttttttttt recordings, and broadcasting organizations. Compiled and tttttttttttttttttttttttttt by Willlam Strauss. Containr documents, books, articles, and a list of authors. 35 pages. 1955. COPYRIGHT BIBLIOGRAPHY. By Henriette Mcrtr. Contains English and tttttttttttttttttttttttttt sections. Authors and titles are tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt, but no tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt has tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt to tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt it down to a suhitrt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt. 21 3 pagn, 1950. 86,348 Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt.. ................... 97,129 92,177 95,855 88, 322 (b) Printed tttttttttttttttttttttttttt in a ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt lan2,644 5,893 6,502 6,282 2,545 guage.. ...................... (c) English books registered for a d 2,027 1,571 2,235 683 595 interim copyright.. 94,657 Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt.. .......................... 100,357 95,416 103,319 97,059 Periodicals ............................ 119,398 108,374 110,872 110,258 113,011 693 837 1,008 1,036 Lectures, sermons, etc. .................. 1,263 Tttttttttttttttttttttttttt or dramatico-musical composi4,604 4,243 4,969 5,720 6,659 tions.. .............................. 65,125 58,087 65,791 60,665 Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt compositions. 85,359 4,844 4,037 4,627 3,273 Maps.. ............................... 2,855 4,820 5,034 Works of art, models or designs.. ......... 5,055 5,904 4,349 872 1,040 620 469 Reproduction of works of art.'.. .......... 609 Drawings or nlastic works of a ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt or 1,554 1,947 1,484 1,603 tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt character.. .................. 2,336 1,585 1,939 1,302 Photographs.. ......................... 2,945 1,891 29,301 Prints, labels and ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt illustrations. ... 34, 563 35, 577 35,233 31,095 vide for a 3-year period of limitations on ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt actions under the copyright law. H. R. 6608, introduced on July 29, 1953, would tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt the requirements of the law as to the form and tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of the copyright notice. Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Decisions.-What is the copyright status of a work of art embodied in an article of utility? This ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt has been tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in a series of cases resulting in a tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of opinion among the courts. The plaintiffs, who are the same in each of these cases, had registered claims of copyright in a number of statuettes of dancing figures, which they then used as bases for lamps tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt and sold by them. The several defendants are lamp manufacturers who tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt and used copies of those statuettes as bases for their lamps. The first of the series of infringement suits brought by the plaintiff, Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt et al. v. Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Lamp Company, 96 F. Supp. 97, was ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt by the Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt for the Tttttttttttttttttttttttttt Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of Illinois in January 1951. The tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt, basing its decision on the premise that the plaintiffs had tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt to use the statuettes as lamp bases, tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt that the lamps were the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of the plaintiffs ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt and as articles of utility could not be copyrighted. This decision was affirmed by the Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in May 1951 ( 188 F. 2d, 611) , and certiorari was denied by the Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt (342 U. S. 829). The next case on a tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt set of facts, Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt et al. v. Rosenthal, 103 F. Supp. 227, was brought in the Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of California and ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in February 1952. The tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt that the statuettes of themselves were appropriate subjects of copyright, regardless of the claimants' intention as to their use, and that their incorporation into lamps did not ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt the copyright protection of the statuettes. The ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt appealed this decision to the Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of Appeals for the Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Circuit. In the next of the series, Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt et al. v. Benederet, 109 F. Supp. 364, tttttttttttttttttttttttttt in December 1952, the Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt for the Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of Michigan reviewed the
By: Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt | Mon, 24 Mar 08 19:28:05 +0000 | | 
ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
Registrations of claims to copyright tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt from 200,354 in tttttttttttttttttttttttttt 1951 to 203,705 this tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt, an ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of 3,35 1 or 1.6 pcrcent, resuming the pattern of ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt that was ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt by a tttttttttttttttttttttttttt last tttttttttttttttttttttttttt. The tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt number of registrations, 56,509, including both ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt and tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt, were tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in Class By for ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt issues of periodicals and newspapers. In second place, registrations in Class E (ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt compositions) totaled 51,538, while registrations ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in Class A (books, pamphlets, etc.) numbered 49,403. (See the chart on the following ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt for registrations by tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt matter classes.) It is tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt to note that music replaced books as second in number of registrations tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt, while books ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt to third place, tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt by music. For each 100 claims registered 3 were rejected, an acceptance tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of 97 perccnt; 15 out of every 100claims required correspondence. The tttttttttttttttttttttttttt revenues were $803,168.50 in tttttttttttttttttttttttttt 1952 as compared to $797,960.50 in ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt 1951, an tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt fees applied of $5,208, or 0.6 percent. A breakdown of the fees is given in a table, "Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of Copyright Business," at the end of this ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt. Reference services to the ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt the completion of 28,500 title searches, representing an tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of 1.2 percent over 1951.
tttttttttttttttttttttttttt; work already protected. Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of certain classes of unpublished works-unpublished books, poetry, song lyrics, etc.is not provided for in the law; rejection has no effect upon the protection such works enioy under - . the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt law. Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of these materials is not provided for in the law. Works in this category have been tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt by the courts as not tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt to copyright. era1 revision is tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt and the Copyright Office has begun to make plans for studying the ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt problems ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in a tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt overhauling of the copyright law. Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt problems relating to copyright protection of tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt works used in tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt products were tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in connection with a series of tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt cases to be summarized later in this tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt. The questions tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt areas of protection under the copyright and tttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt laws with respect to tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt works embodied in articles of utility. Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt questions regarding the protection of applied art are currently under consideration by bar and trade groups tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt with ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt. Studies of several other problems of Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt scope but of ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt significance to the administration of the copyright law should be ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt. An ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt study has been tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt regarding the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt matter of copyright in the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt field of ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt prints and labels. Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt interest in tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt developments in the field of choreography has ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt questions now under study regarding the area of copyright protection for works of that character. Also under consideration are the problems tttttttttttttttttttttttttt by ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt photographers who are tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt methods of obtaining copyright protection for a tttttttttttttttttttttttttt repertory of tttttttttttttttttttttttttt works at a low cost per unit. Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt, methods are being explored for copyrighting a collection of ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt dissertations as a group. Tttttttttttttttttttttttttt Operations.-The tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in the volume of business during ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt 1953 tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt the importance of tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt the work of the Office on a current basis. An average of almost 1,000 applications for ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt are received in the Office on each business day, in addition to a mass of correspondence. During the ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt, standard workloads and tttttttttttttttttttttttttt schedules were tttttttttttttttttttttttttt for the major operations performed in the Office, and tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt reports of the workload status of each process are tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt and reviewed so that any lag in the tttttttttttttttttttttttttt schedule is re- amendments on matters of detail have been enacted to tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt its most tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt inadequacies, or to ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt a treaty obligation, the law has not kept pace with these developments. The need for a ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt revision of tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt copyright laws in the light of mode m conditions has been recognized in many other countries, which have either enacted tttttttttttttttttttttttttt revisions in tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt years or are now in the process of formulating such revisions. Even at the ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of its passage, the 1909 law, though considered a tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt, was thought by some to have its shortcomings. The ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in PublishersJ Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt for July 3, 1909, tttttttttttttttttttttttttt that the law tttttttttttttttttttttttttt "an ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt copyright, though it falls far ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of the aim and hope of the friends of copyright." The inadequacy of that law a tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt-century later is now tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in far greater degree by all ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt. Much care and effort went into the framing of the 1909 law, but tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt it was the product of compromises arrived at in conferences with tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt groups, each of which surveyed the field of copyright from its own tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt and partisan point of view. Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt efforts between 1924 and 1940 to ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt a general revision of the 1909 law tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in unreconciled controversies and failure. General revision is being approached today in a somewhat different manner. For 1957 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1958 ................... 1959 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1960 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1961 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By: | Mon, 24 Mar 08 19:28:05 +0000 | | tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
Tttttttttttttttttttttttttt O F T H E REGISTER O F CQPY~GHTS, 1960 Cotolog of c o p 'ght Entries, Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Series MOTION PJCT RES 1894-191 2. Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt from the records of the Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt States Cop right Office by Howard Lamarr Walls. 32 pages. 1953. Buckram, pgce $2.00. MOTION PIC in Classes
notice and followed a tendency toward less stringency in ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt the tttttttttttttttttttttttttt provisions for notice. The tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of publication of some copies without any notice of copyright received some attention, too, in the fabrics and jewelry cases and in Tttttttttttttttttttttttttt Aids, Znc. v. R. H . Macy & Co., inc., 264 F . 2d 93 (2d Cir. 1959), involving newspaper advertisements for massage machines. If the lack of notice was not the fault of the copyright claimant, the courts were ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt to ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt such omissions as not tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt. The ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt definition of "publication" continues to ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt issues. The tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in McZntyre v. Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt-A Music Corp., 166 F . Supp. 681 (S.D. ' Calif. 1958), besides ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt that the "tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt melodies and tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt embellishments" in questions were not copyrightable, tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt its tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt to the proposition enunciated in a few tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt decisions that the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt sale of phonograph recordings constitutes publication terminating ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt-law rights in the composition on the records. General recognition of this tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt undoubtedly accounts for much of the ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in unpublished music ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt. In Fader v. Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Century-Fox Corp., 169 F. Supp. 880 (S.D.N.Y., Jan. 23, 1959), the ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt's contention that the plaintiff's copyright was ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt was tttttttttttttttttttttttttt in tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt part on the latter's admission that the scenario filed with the Copyright Office and registered as a "book" was in tttttttttttttttttttttttttt form and had never been reproduced in copies and published. However, the ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt said that since the work had not been published, as required for tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt copyright, the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt and tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttt to ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt copyright did not ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt to ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt plaintiffs tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt-law rights. Two label cases sanctioned Copyright Office practices, one tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt and one ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt. I n Kitchen.7 of Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Lee, Znc. v. Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Foods Corp., 266 F . 2d 541 (2d Cir. 1959), the principles ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in the Office's Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt 46 on the limitations of copyright in prints and labels were tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt The number of copyright registrations for the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt was the third highest in the history of the Office, being exceeded only in the years 1947 and 1948. Registrations of copyright claims tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt to a tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of 218,506 for tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt 1953 as compared with 203,705 for ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt 1952, an ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of 7.2 percent. This tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt occurred in almost all classes. Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt compositions showed the highest tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt-7,764, while books tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt 2,944 and periodicals 2,862. In number of registrations, periodicals led the field with 59,371, tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt followed by tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt compositions with 59,302, and books came third with 52,347. Although this ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in volume was much greater than could have been tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt, the Office nevertheless tttttttttttttttttttttttttt maintained its schedules for ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt work on a ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt current basis without a corresponding ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in staff. On June 30, 1953, there were more than 5,000,000 copyright registrations in effect in the Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt States. The chart on tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt 2 shows the number (to the nearest 5,000) of copyright claims in each class that were registered or renewed during the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt 28 years and were still in effect at the end of the tttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt. The ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of fees ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt during ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt 1953 was the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in the history of the Copyright Office. A ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of $865,302.50 in applied fees was turned over to the Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt OF THE REGISTER OF COPYRIGHTS, 1950 the issue on motion to tttttttttttttttttttttttttt the complaint was whether the plaintiff had tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt its copyright by publication without a tttttttttttttttttttttttttt copyright notice. The tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt dismissed the complaint, holding that the plaintiff had tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt its copyright both because of publication without tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt notice and because of using a tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt registered as a print or label to be used in connection with the sale of merchandise as a part of the merchandise itself. There is also language in the opinion to the effect that designs for fabrics and for dresses are not copyrightable. In Czoub Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt v. Witufull, 86 P. Supp. 573 (D. C., S. D. N. Y.), it was tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt both that an assignment of copyright not tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt covering the right to sue for a tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt infringement gives no such right and that the substitution of the name of the tttttttttttttttttttttttttt in a .copyright notice before the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of the assignment in the Copyright Office constitutes abandonment of the copyright. The Copyright Office has always been bothered by the ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of & minimis; that is, when is a work submitted for copyright tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt too tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt to tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt the writing of an author? That problem is considered in Forsfmann Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Co. v.]. W. Mays, 85 U. S. P. Q. 200 (D. C., E. D. N. Y.). In this case, although the plaintiff prevailed on the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt competition issue, its copyright was tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt. The tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt to copyright tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt to a label containing the words "Forstmann's 100% Virgin Wool" interwoven with three tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt fleurs-de-lis. The ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt said that the ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt provisions as to copyright ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt "only to as' are the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of intelwritings ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt labor, . '. . not to labels which ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt or ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt the articles to which they are tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt and which have no value separated from the articles and no possible influence upon science or the useful arts .' Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt that analysis to the facts of our case. there trict Tttttttttttttttttttttttttt for the Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of Columbia, the plaintiff sought to tttttttttttttttttttttttttt a tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt order directing the tttttttttttttttttttttttttt of a carpet tttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttt "Be1 Canto," which had been tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt rejected by the Office. However, the plaintiff dismissed his action, with prejudice, on June 22, 1959. Trophy bases as "works of art" were thc tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of the third action in the nature of mandamus against the Register, Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Inc. v. Fisher, filed on May 25, 1959 (Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt No. 1426-59, D.D.C.) . These "works of art" cases are sequels to the tttttttttttttttttttttttttt decision of the Tttttttttttttttttttttttttt States Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in 1954 in the case of Mazer v. Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt (347 U.S. 201), establishing that the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt or tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt use in industry of an article ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt for copyright does not bar or tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt its copyright as a work of art. In addition to the problems in the jewelry field, which were ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt in last tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt's ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt, new problems tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt up in connection with textiles and found their way into the courts. Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Brenda Fabrics, Inc., 169 F. Supp. 142 (S.D.N.Y. 1959), represents the first tttttttttttttttttttttttttt decision in favor of the copyrightability of a "ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt printed upon ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt fabric3'-an tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt pattern tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt "Byzantium." I n a ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt action by the same plaintiff, Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc., v. The Acadia Co., 173 F . Supp. 292 (S.D.N.Y. 1959), the ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt also upheld copyright in a tttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt "Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Glory." I n Scarves by Vera, Inc. v. Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Merchants and Manufacturers, Inc., 173 F . Supp. 625 (S.D.N.Y. 1959), the ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt that designs printed on blouse fabrics were a tttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttt of copyright. A major problem where the work itself is very tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt or the ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt is tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt is that of affixing a notice of copyright in the tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt form and tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt. In the last two cases tttttttttttttttttttttttttt, the courts considered as tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt notices on the selvage of tttttttttttttttttttttttttt goods and on a label sewn into the seam of a garment. Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt litigation in the jewelry area, represented by Don Kasoff, Inc. v. Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Jewelry Mfg. Co., 171 F . Supp. 603 (S.D.N.Y. 1959), also tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt the ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt of the use of trade names in the
By: Tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt | Mon, 24 Mar 08 19:28:05 +0000 | | | tttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttt
